Friday, April 27, 2012

My Other Posts


My blogger website is mostly an historical archive now... I think the sermons published even earlier on the Christ Church website must be gone now.

My sermons now can be found on my website www.malcolmcyoung.com

Sunday, June 25, 2006

Calming the Storms

M15

Job 38:1-11
Ps. 107:1-3,23-32
2 Cor. 6:1-13
Mk. 4:35-41

“Then they cried to the Lord in their trouble, and he delivered them from their distress. He stilled the storm to a whisper and quieted the waves of the sea” (Ps. 107).

It was exactly like a bad dream of a dinner party in which you in which you couldn’t stop yourself from saying something thoughtless and insensitive. This morning I preached about suffering at the 8:00 a.m. service. I looked out at my friends there and almost everyone in the room had lost a spouse or child or parent in the last few years. My first story was about a man who committed suicide and none of us could recover from it.

In her book The Year of Magical Thinking, Joan Didion writes about her experience after her husband’s death and her daughter’s fatal illness. Like C.S. Lewis she describes the way that grief isolates us and destroys language. Grief creates distance and this morning at 8:00 a.m. we were lost in it.

Sometimes people ask me how I manage to handle the suffering I face in ministry. Often I do not handle it well. Harold Brumbaum our former rector and I have talked about how difficult it is as priests to fully empathize with people who are suffering without being overcome by it. Our readings today provide a way of talking about personal pain and Christianity.

1. Avoiding suffering. The physical act of preaching can be exhausting. I have it easy. I preach very short sermons, to a small, attentive and forgiving congregation. And I have a microphone. Still, watching and adjusting to your responses, thinking of the right word, planning what is coming next takes a lot of energy. Imagine what it was like for eighteenth century preachers like John Wesley. In his diary he guessed that he traveled 8,000 miles and preached 5,000 sermons every year.

After a similarly punishing schedule of sermons and healings Jesus feels physically and mentally exhausted. I love the way that the Bible puts it, “leaving the crowd behind him, they took him with them, just as he was.” When I first was ordained this last clause was a mystery to me. Now I think it means that he simply never had the chance to rest. Despite the dangers of a building storm Jesus falls asleep in the stern.

I remember surfing at Kanaha on the Northshore of Maui when winter waves higher than our house were draining a razor sharp reef. A set would come in and I would frantically paddle up these mountains hoping that I could just reach the top before the wave broke. There is nothing like this kind of experience to remind us how completely God’s hand sustains our fragile life. I’ve never been tempted to sleep at a moment like this.

But seasoned sailors guided the helm of Jesus’ boat. He trusted the expertise of these fishermen. He put his life in their hands. I wonder what would have happened if Jesus had not been with them.

I imagine that they would have used all their skills, made good decisions and somehow pulled through. Instead Jesus’ very presence on the boat gave them an odd kind of permission to panic. Rather than relying on their own inner strength and expertise they immediately look to Jesus to take their problems away. Jesus says, “Why are you so afraid? Have you still no faith?” I don’t think he says this to be cruel but to make explicit the temptation that we all feel to wallow in dependence when God calls us to exercise courage.

Parents constantly have to decide when it is appropriate to help their children and when to let them work out their problems on their own. A half dozen times a day Micah or Melia ask for help with something that they should do themselves. Sometimes it is hard to discern if and how to intervene.

When I was a child, three neighborhood bullies were working me over when my mother walked by on the sidewalk. As she went by she said that dinner was ready. The moment she turned the corner the boys continued humiliating me. I went home in tears because she hadn’t helped. She explained that she did help me by giving me the excuse to go home with her right then. She knew that by intervening more forcefully it would only have made everything worse during the next time they confronted me.

Our own personal security is a central organizing principle of this community. Too often secular suburban life teaches us to deal with suffering by avoiding it. The sad fact in this time and place is that sometimes when things go wrong people stay away from you as if your pain were somehow contagious. As human beings God made us to survive suffering. Walking with Jesus means having the strength of Jesus and facing pain in the way that he did, that is, with some measure of confidence in God’s love.

2. Sources of Fear. At birth a child is afraid of two things: falling and loud noises. Everything else that you fear is something that you learned to fear. Mostly you are afraid because the world taught you to be. Try listing the things that you fear most. At the top of that list are probably noble worries about people you love. Further down are some of the fears we have difficulty admitting to ourselves.

One of our deepest fears, in this ultra-capitalist culture, is the fear of failing. In so many ways we define what is good as success. Performance then becomes the way we define, identify and group people. Where we live, how live, what we do and most importantly how we regard ourselves and others arise out of our worship of success.

From college, I remember bumper stickers that said “Berkeley Engineering.” Maybe I didn’t get it but I thought that they implied, “it is not enough to be bragging about being smarter than all the people who didn’t get into Berkeley. I’m smarter than all the other non-engineers here too.” Perhaps I thought this because I was just insecure myself.

Of all the organizations that you belong to the church is one of the few places that doesn’t have grouping people according to their success at the heart of its mission. Yet even here I cannot stop evaluating our performance in thoroughly world terms.

If somehow through magic our worship of success could be deleted from our character, we wouldn’t even recognize ourselves. Would you have chosen the same major, career, friends, spouse or home? Imagine who you would become if fear of failure no longer motivated you.

The apostle Paul shows us what it might be like to replace our obsession with personal success with a passion for God’s Kingdom. Sometimes, I think that is why he is so hard to understand. To friends in Corinth he writes, “We are treated as imposters, and yet are true; as unknown, and yet are well known; as dying, and see – we are alive; as punished, and yet not killed; as sorrowful, yet always rejoicing; as poor, yet making many rich; as having nothing, and yet possessing everything.” Instead of referring to the world, he sees his life in relation to God’s Kingdom.

You too could have nothing and possess everything. Like Paul you could be a person transformed by freedom from fear. You too could see that Jesus’ failure as a Messiah, that is as a kind of first century global dictator, represents a huge success for the human race. Because of his crucifixion we see failure as “both real and not final.” To put it in Rowan Williams words, “resurrection is the transaction in human beings that brings about the sense of a selfhood [that is] given not achieved.”

3. The Promise of Jesus. Christianity is not just a religion of ancient texts. In the catacombs and in early house churches we have images too. One of the most powerful examples of these are pictures which depict the church as a kind of boat awash in the storms of this life. Although we will all suffer, some of us will face tragedy far beyond failure, exceeding what we think we can bear. It threatens to obliterate our identity and even our existence.

For Christians this sometimes feels like we have fallen out of the boat of faith. One of the greatest blessings for me is that I get to witness how Christians reach out to brothers and sisters who waves have washed overboard. As Christians we never need to face our tragedies alone. We are never strangers to the world or to each other as the body of Christ.

In a very practical way, prayer helps me when the suffering seems overwhelming. I pray at all different hours of the day. I lift up all my concerns to God. When I cannot control my response to sadness, when my thoughts are thinking me, the Jesus Prayer gives me a deep peace in my heart. It is simple, “Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me.” After years of slowly repeating this prayer, it calms me and I feel the strength of Christ.

The church and prayer can help us but so can our faith. Death always has a certain kind of hold on our house. We pray for everyone at Christ Church who has died. Recently though our six-year-old son Micah has been very afraid of death. He asks when we, his parents, will die. Most of my answers have to be that we do not know what will happen to us or when. But most of the people who I have been with at death were by that time ready for it.

When I was a little boy like him I was afraid of shaving, of driving a car, of having children and adult responsibilities. But by the time I was old enough I was ready for all of these things. I expect that dying will be like that too for most of us. If we are not ready, God will help us to prepare. Just in the same way that we have faith in God to care for us every day, we have faith that he will continue to love us after we have died. In terrible tragedy faith may not be enough but it can help.

In conclusion, I hope this morning to remind us that we are equipped to handle suffering, that our life doesn’t have to be organized around the principle of avoiding pain. Second, I pray that your faith in Jesus will give you freedom in a society distorted by its fear of failure. Finally, when you face real tragedy I hope that the church, your habit of prayer and faith will draw you near to the Christ who says to all creation, “Peace, be still.”

_____________
John Wesley, The Heart of John Wesley’s Journal. Ed. Percy Livingstone Paker and Augustine Birrell (NY: Flemming H. Revell, Co., 1903), 392, 97.
Rowan Williams “Resurrection and Peace,” On Christian Theology (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2000), 273, 271.

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Advice for Graduates

M13

1 Sam. 15:34-16:13
Ps. 20
2 Cor. 5:6-10, 14-17
Mk. 4:26-34

“So if anyone is in Christ, there is a new creation; everything old has passed away see, everything has become new” (2 Cor. 5)!

Our first years at Christ Church were marked by an invisible anxiety. I arrived here without having written a single word of my dissertation. I secretly wondered if I would ever finish. After spending every summer constantly writing the faculty approved my work in the fall of 2004. Heidi and I were so excited about going back to the Harvard Commence exercises. We had never both been away from the children. Some of our friends thought that it would be a weekend of romance.

They could not have been more wrong. To save money and because I had always wondered what it would be like, we stayed at a monastery on the Charles River – in separate cells, without air conditioning, eating meals with the monks in silence. I have wonderful childhood memories of Cambridge and everything was beautiful. But still our high expectations for our time there meant that we almost couldn’t help but be disappointed.

Almost all graduations fail to live up to our expectations. At their heart is a moment abstracted from both the past and from the future. In that time we regard what has happened with nostalgia and imagine the infinite possibilities of the future. At that time we want to be reminded that we are creatures of both earth and heaven, that we are more than a collection of nerve impulses or the product of our historical circumstances. But we are not.

During Bishop Swing’s Maundy Thursday sermon to the clergy he spoke about how even at Episcopal High Schools our youth are not taught about holiness or the depth of the human soul. In this season of graduations we all can bear witness to the higher life that we experience in God. You may be called to do this and I want to share with you three pieces of advice to graduates in this time between past and future.

1. Not Conformed. The Apostle Paul wrote a series of letters to a congregation he had never visited in Rome. His advice to them is simple “Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your minds, so that you may discern what is the will of God” (Rom. 12:2). The world will distort who we are in order to sell us things and to manipulate our political judgments. It will shamelessly exploit our fears, faults, prejudices, our sense of superiority and our sexual desires in order to influence us. Billions of dollars will be spent each year and the most advanced technologies will be used to get your attention and to change who you are.

Advertisers will try to convince you that you can only be loved for your perfection. But Paul wants us to know that God calls to us in our brokenness. The novelist Harry Crew said, “Nothing good in the world has ever been done by well-rounded people. The good work is done by people with jagged, broken edges, because those edges cut things and leave an imprint, a design.”

One example of this in my life was a kid in my Junior High School confirmation class named Mike Franti. Mike’s birth father was African American and his mother was white. Our neighbors in this mostly white town had adopted him as a baby. On his way to being six foot six inches, in every way he stood out.

Back in those days most people only saw Mike as a basketball player and he did win an athletic scholarship to USF. But there was far more to him. He loved music. When I went to college in the Bay Area I saw posters for his band on telephone poles. Now all these years later Michael is part rock star, part poet, part hip hop artist and a major prophet. His band Spearhead is recognized around the world.

Michael’s music is impossible to characterize. It didn’t exist when we were kids. Instead of writing songs about love and breaking-up he sings about prison reform, racism, AIDS and peace. He criticizes the violence of Gangsta Rap and the death penalty. Michael is the one who said, “You can bomb the world to pieces, but you can’t bomb it into peace.” Twenty thousand people attend his Power to the Peaceful festival each year in San Francisco. Michael’s success comes from being most truly himself, letting his rough edges leave a mark on society.

The apostle Paul says, “if anyone is in Christ - there is a new creation: everything old has passed away” (2 Cor. 5). Our work as Christians begins as we discover the absolutely unique way that God will transform the world through us. You are unlike anyone in history or who will ever be. No one has been called to precisely your ministry except you.

Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury describes every Christian alive as part of a global interpretation of the Bible (“billions of diverse Son-like, Father-directed lives… a vast living exegesis of the Bible”). If you want to understand what the Bible means look first at these people. Each is unique, each one transformed by God not conformed by the world.

2. A second piece of advice for graduates is, “learn to do it yourself.” My friend received a toolkit when she graduated from high school. She still uses it, but it is even more important as a symbol that she is the one who ultimately has responsibility for her life. It is important to acknowledge and benefit from the advice of experts. Doctors, plumbers, lawyers, engineers and priests can help you. But this expertise must be balanced against the passion of your interest. The high school guidance counselor may know a lot about different colleges, but you are the one who actually has to live your life. You are the one who decides what kind of person you will be and how to use your energies. God gives us freedom and it is tragically possible to waste our life.

It is important to take responsibility for your philosophical, religious and political ideas. Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was probably the most important philosopher since the ancient Greeks. More important than all of his philosophical ideas, indeed perhaps the source of them, was his motto – Dare to think for yourself. Don’t leave it up to others to decide what you believe about God or to tell you what is in the Bible. Look at it yourself and form your own opinion.

Above all don’t let someone else be in charge of your prayer life. Don’t expect priests to “do” church for you. Make daily prayer a habit. Pray in the car, as you walk, in waiting rooms, before everyone wakes up or after they all go to sleep. Pray with your children. Pray when your faith feels strong and when God seems distant to you. Prayer is important when you take on the adventure of learning to do things for yourself.

3. My last advice is to pay attention to the little things. Who you are and what really matters arise out of small things. 13.7 billion years ago all the matter in the universe was compressed into a tiny spot so infinitesimally small that it had no dimensions at all. It wasn’t in space because space didn’t exist yet. In less than a minute the universe was a million billion miles across creating space and growing. Within three minutes, in the ten billion degree heat, 98% of the matter in the universe was created. My point is that everything started small.

Jesus says that the kingdom of God “is like a mustard seed… the smallest of all the seeds on earth…when it grows up [it] becomes the greatest of all shrubs…” (Mk. 4). Jesus repeats this point in various ways, but even a small amount of faith can generate extraordinary results. Perhaps you are thinking that this is an easy thing for the Son of God to say but it is also exactly how Jesus acted.

Every week for me is filled with tremendous disappointment. All the boundless possibility I feel on Monday with its to do lists is inevitably is frustrated. I can’t help all the poor people, visit everyone in the hospital, talk to all the lonely people or minister to all who need it. I don’t even make a dent in the suffering that I see. Who gets helped and who is passed by seems maddeningly unsystematic. I constantly regret not having done enough. My whole life of ministry is filled with a few small things.

For years this bothered me until I began to realize that this was not so different from Jesus’ own ministry. In the twenty-first century we set goals like the total eradication of polio or the elimination of poverty around the globe. Yesterday, there was an article in the New York Times about Jimmy Wales, a man my age who started Wikipedia and changed how we know about the world.

Jesus did not work like this. He healed a few people, cast out some demons. He talked to a few others about the love that God has for us. But Jesus did not go on television. He didn’t go to Rome or Corinth. In his life he wasn’t internationally recognized as an authority on religious matters. He simply did not act on that scale. He worked quietly in the obscure countryside with the people who just happened to be around him.

Jesus helped in small things. He taught a small number of people that the kingdom of God is a tiny seed within us, that only a little faith could result in extraordinary things. In doing this he changed the world.

I believe that it is the little things we do every day that matter most. I had only been a priest for about a year when a member of my church came up to me and told me that he was having an affair. He told me that his wife didn’t know it but that she was really a lesbian and that she didn’t satisfy him sexually. Since then dozens of people have told me about their extra-marital affairs.

Over all these years, I can’t help but think that by the time they have come to me it is too late. My experience leads me to believe that these large infidelities only follow from small, every day betrayals. We all have a thousand little opportunities each day to show our love or disrespect for our friends and family. John Lennon says, “Life is what happens when you are busy making other plans.” These little things that you teach your children and practice yourself are life.

In conclusion, through God do not be conformed by the world, take responsibility for yourself and live conscious of the little things.

Let us pray: “Give us grace o Lord, to work while it is day fulfilling diligently and patiently whatever duty thou appointest us, doing small things in the day of small things and great labours if thou summon us to any. In Christ’s name we pray. Amen.”
_______________________________________
Writer’s Almanac with Garrison Keillor June 7, 2006. http://writersalmanac.publicradio.org/programs/2006/06/05/index.html
In review by Jason Byassee, The Christian Century, June 13, 2006, 36ff.
Bill Bryson, A Short History of Everything (NY: Broadway Books, 2003), 9-10.
Katie Hafner, “Growing Wikipedia Changes its ‘Anyone Can Edit’ Policy,” New York Times, 17 June 2006. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/17/technology/17wiki.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5094&en=7f2dcfa9db8cc0ef&hp&ex=1150603200&adxnnl=0&partner=homepage&adxnnlx=1150556959-kVQHxMQlrpjr1rugd/Q9Ig
Christina Rossetti wrote this prayer. This last section was influenced by Martha Sterne, “A Day of Small Things,” Day 1, 18 June 2006. http://www.day1.net/

Monday, June 12, 2006

What is the Spirit?

M12

Acts 2:1-21
Ps. 104:25-35,37
Rom. 8:22-27
Jn. 15:26-7, 16:4b-15

“No, this is what was spoke through the prophet Joel: ‘In the last days it will be, God declares, that I will send my Spirit upon all flesh…” (Acts 2).

Today we celebrate one of the four most important feasts of the year – Pentecost. It is the birthday of the church when we remember how the spirit descended upon the apostles. We wear red as a symbol of the Holy Spirit’s love and to represent the tongues of fire that were signs of its presence.

This morning I want to think with you about a question that is easy to articulate and difficult to answer. What is the spirit? Part of what makes this a difficult question is that we share this word and this idea with people outside and inside the church who misunderstand it. We know what Pentecost means because the group of people who use this word is restricted to a relatively small group who have largely shared values. But everyone uses the word spirit and spiritual to describe anything from cheerleading squads to business strategies to a sense of our own interior depth. Fortunately our readings give us strong direction in this question.

1. Imagine the birth of the church, when there was only a small group of scared people who had already shared everything together, who had sacrificed their families and work, who had found miraculous new life in Jesus. Their friend entered triumphantly into Jerusalem and only a few days later was executed as a political and religious criminal. These first followers felt no security. They had no plan, only a shared sense of disappointment.

Suddenly the spirit came down on them like fire and filled them. When they spoke, others heard their own native language. Even in our time we recognize that it is a miracle when we meet someone who really understands us. The puritan Jonathan Edwards emphasized that it is God’s nature to communicate (“God is a communicative being”). God has something to say to every person, to every living being. To us, God says, “I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh.” This does not mean all ministers, or all Episcopalians or all Christians but all of living reality will show the presence of God.

Other very different depictions of the spirit and the church exist. One example is Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code which sold 40 million copies and recently came out as a movie. To summarize the story very briefly a Harvard symbologist named Robert Langdon and a French cryptologist Sophie Neveu work together to solve mysteries related to the murder of the Louvre Museum curator. These involve secret religious societies, codes in famous paintings and buildings and ultimately the search for the holy grail. The institutional church seems fiendishly intent on subverting any effort to discover the truth.

The novel is fun to read and it may make some people more curious about God. But there are two kinds of problems with it. The first concerns facts. The Christian Century magazine uses the word “truthiness” to account for the appeal of The Da Vinci Code. Truthiness describes the way that people insist what they want or feel to be true should be treated as true. Politicians and public figures constantly do this. This isn’t totally different than recent scandals around the question of how true a memoir must be to make it nonfiction. Brown’s novel fits in perfectly with this cultural climate.

We like to feel that we are learning something even as we read a novel and this is what The Da Vinci Code implicitly promises. The book cover describes the novel as “intricately layered with remarkable research and detail.” Immediately following the title page Brown includes something that looks like a dictionary entry which says, “Fact:… All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents and secret rituals in this novel are accurate.”

According to the novel “the greatest cover-up in human history” was that, “not only was Jesus Christ married, but He was a father… Mary Magdalene was the Holy Vessel… that bore the bloodline of Jesus Christ” (249). Also I should let you know that, “Walt Disney made it his quiet life’s work to pass on the Grail story to future generations” (261). Biblical scholars may sometimes say odd things but they have to offer some support for their findings and no one I have heard of has made suggestions like these.

Crazy statements and treating Christ as some kind of last name rather than as a messianic title made me completely distracted as I read this book. Being a serious student of religion and reading The Da Vinci Code is like someone who knows about baseball reading a novel about how the Chicago White Sox won the 1967 world series… by strategically running the bases the wrong way round.

The second problem with The Da Vinci code has more to do with the spirit of its depiction of Christianity rather than particular facts. Secret rituals, hidden symbols, bloodlines and magical powers are not at the heart of Christian faith and practice. As I said earlier, God is a communicative being. God pours out the Holy Spirit on all flesh. Christians have always made their claims in public where their ideas can be confirmed or rejected. Jesus says his followers will be distinguished by what they do in public not by secret beliefs. I saw a bumper sticker yesterday that says, “God wants spiritual fruits not religious nuts.” The fruit of the spirit is love.

2. The second thing that scripture reminds us about the spirit concerns its connection to prayer. The apostle Paul suffered for his faith. Through prayer the spirit gave him great strength. In a letter to his friends he writes, “the Spirit helps us in our weakness; for we do not know how to pray as we ought, but that very Spirit intercedes for us with sighs too deep for words” (Rom. 8). This week I met another Paul who helped me to understand this.

It all started with a magic carpet ride. On Wednesday night I flew with Will Price over the snow-covered Rockies to Montana in a small plane for one day of fly-fishing on the Blackfoot River. Growing up I played a lot of sports and worked outside in lumberyards, doing landscaping and out in the fields. In college I continued with sports and lived in a residence hall with 200 men. Although since my ordination I am almost never in all-male environments, I miss this. I enjoy spending time with men like our fishing guide Paul.

Paul is a powerful man in his sixties. He’s intelligent and strong, with a beard and piercing eyes that cut right through the surface of things. He tells the truth simply and humorously without exaggeration. You could depend on him in an emergency.

We pulled our boat out for lunch twenty yards away from a nest with two immature bald eagles and their mother. Will’s father was talking about the way that our failures can more powerfully shape our character than our successes. This led Paul to express his own regrets about his divorce from his wife of forty-one years. He also talked about marrying a woman who had never been married before and who was four years older than himself. “This time I am doing things differently,” Paul said. “My wife and I begin each day looking each other in the eyes and praying.”

If you pray you will become acquainted with the spirit. You’ll know yourself better too. Prayer is when I begin to be honest with myself about what I really want. I face my weaknesses and the narrowness of my vision. And the spirit takes our badly articulated prayers and “with sighs too deep for words,” makes God’s love known to us.

3. My last observation about the Holy Spirit comes from Jesus. This is the hardest part to explain. At the Last Supper Jesus reassures his disciples that even though he will die he will never abandon them. The Greek word that he uses for spirit is paraclete. The dictionary says that this is literally the person you call to for help - like a doctor if you have chest pains or a lawyer if you find yourself in jail or a river guide if you are drowning. Jesus says, this “Advocate… will prove the world wrong about sin and righteousness and judgment… he will guide you for he will not speak on his own…” (Jn. 15).

Earlier I approvingly quoted a Montana bumper sticker about religious nuts and spiritual fruits. The one thing that bothers me is the way that it suggests an opposition between bad institutional religion and good private spirituality. I want to say something about my friends who describe themselves as spiritual but not religious.

I think what they mean by this is an inner experience of depth, a “true self,” an authentic self free of all the roles we play, a self independent of how others perceive us. For them this is what spirituality is and because this idea is very powerful in our age Christians begin to mistake this idea of spirituality for the Holy Spirit.

The archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams believes that this idea of the self comes out of a fantasy of perfect communication. We imagine “an ideal other,” “a listener to whom I am making perfect sense,” a sympathetic hearer who always gives us the benefit of the doubt and understands our often less-than-clear good intentions. Williams says that the problem with this is that the world is not filled with people who understand us perfectly.

One may go further and note that often we do not even understand ourselves very well. We lie to ourselves in order to justify our bad intentions. A private spirituality based on the idea of a true self may be a very deeply seated way of avoiding how God is drawing us to the holy.

When I am in an argument with my wife Heidi and I find myself saying, “that’s just the way that I am,” I know that I am on shaky ground. The spirit is not a deeply interior matter of being stubbornly true to yourself. The spirit works through other people, through all flesh. Our spouses and neighbors and colleagues and church family are the way that the spirit brings the world to God. They are the way that the “Advocate… will prove the world wrong about sin” (Jn. 15).

In conclusion, the late Roman Catholic professor Ralph Kiefer used to say, “The Bible is not the Word of God. The Word of God is what God says to the church when the Bible is being read.” Real people, not words on a page are the way that God calls to you.

This church has no secrets. It exists in and is constituted by the Holy Spirit revealing itself in all flesh. Like my friend Paul, in our weakness the spirit calls us into new strength through prayer “too deep for words.” The spirit working in others “proves the world wrong about sin,” not through an ideal imaginary true self but in the real people in our lives. On this Pentecost morning, I invite you to celebrate God’s spirit in all of us together.
____________________
The American Dialect Society named the word “truthiness” as the word of the year in 2005. Although Stephen Colbert reinvented the word as part of his political satire, this idea has been around since the nineteenth century. Rodney Clapp, “Dan Brown’s Truthiness: The Appeal of the Da Vinci Code,” The Christian Century, May 16, 2006, 22. See also Wikipedia “Truthiness” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truthiness. In this last source Colbert in character says, "The Oxford English Dictionary has a definition for 'truthy' dating back to the 1800s....'The fact that they looked it up in a book just shows that they don't get the idea of truthiness at all,' Stephen Colbert said Thursday. 'You don't look up truthiness in a book, you look it up in your gut.’”
Page numbers from Dan Brown, The Da Vinci Code (NY: Doubleday, 2005).
“paraklesis” in Liddell and Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon, (NY: Oxford University Press, 1958)
Rowan Williams, “Interiority and Epiphany: A Reading in New Testament Ethics,” On Christian Theology (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2000), 239-241.
Richard Fabian from an unpublished lecture delivered at Sewanee on St. Gregory Nyssen Church in San Francisco

Thursday, May 25, 2006

Abiding in California

M11

Acts 8:26-40
Ps. 22:24-30
1 Jn. 4:7-21
Jn. 15:1-8


“Those who abide in me and I in them bear much fruit, because apart from me you can do nothing” (John 15).

Between heaven and earth suspended on updrafts above the redwood forests and just below the chaparral of Mount Tamalpais hovers a red-tailed hawk. This keen-eyed hunter seems oblivious to this magnificent setting, to the skyscrapers of the financial district and the massive tanker slipping out through the Golden Gate past Seal Rock and Ocean Beach. Great bridges and cities seem so insignificant in comparison to Mount Diablo, the expansive Bay, the ancient forests of the Santa Cruz Mountains and the infinite Pacific Ocean.

On Friday night we celebrated a friend’s sixty-fifth birthday at the West Point Inn on Mt. Tam, accessible only by a two-mile hike, seventeen hundred feet above sea level. The huge city, the fourth largest metropolitan area in the country, seems so quiet up there (where the wingspan of a swallow at sunset seems larger than Sutro Tower in the distance). I sat there on the porch of that historic building and gave thanks to God that we live here together. I tried to understand what it means to make this place my home, what it means to abide here.

Abide is a thoroughly archaic word, eight of seventeen uses in the Oxford English Dictionary are obsolete. We never use it. We don’t say that people abide together before marriage. We don’t ask new acquaintances where they abide. I suspect that Christianity is the only thing keeping this word alive. Abiding represents a central idea in the gospel of John from the first chapter when John the Baptist’s disciples ask Jesus where he abides (Jn. 1:38) to the last supper when Jesus tells his own disciples to abide in his love. Jesus promises quite simply, “If you abide in me, and my words abide in you, ask for whatever you wish, and it will be done for you” (Jn. 15). What does it mean to abide in Christ?

Understanding what it means to be a Californian helps us to see the challenges that we face as we try to abide in Christ. I want to begin by thinking about three elements of abiding in California.

1. Fiction. I hope that by this time all of you recognize that California is more than a place. Even if you don’t claim it, it is part of your identity. Even if you don’t recognize it, its stories are yours. Its stories are you.

From the beginning California was a fictional place. In 1510 the Spanish writer Garci Ordonez de Montalvo wrote a bestselling novel (Las Sergas de Esplandian) about the siege of Constantinople. There at the battle was a race of Amazons under the command of Queen Calafia. They were from a place he invented. It was located “on the right hand of the Indies… very close to the Terrestrial Paradise. It was rich in gold and gems. He called it California.

The dominant stories of California share in common a hope for surprising and unexpected success. The fictional wealth of El Dorado motivated the Spanish explorers who discovered California. Gold rush dreams led to a population explosion and sudden statehood. The entrepreneurial story of changing the world and accumulating wealth and power along the way still exercises a powerful claim on our imagination. I don’t know how many, but this week more people moved here to become a star.

2. Conflict. California is not just a fiction. It is not just a dream or a hope. It is also a shared history of conflict. Some scholars have suggested that one third of all Native Americans in the continental United States lived in California before European contact. This population was almost completely wiped out in a way that highlights the difference between how the mission system operated in Mexico and here.

By the 1920’s there were more Latinos living in Los Angeles than any other American city. Millions of these Americans with their American born children were forcibly repatriated to Mexico during the 1930’s by a program which historians rightly call ethnic cleansing. The persecution of Japanese Americans didn’t begin during World War II when 110,000 of them who were locked up behind barbed wire in remote relocation camps (227). In the early years of the twentieth century the White California movement, which included the most powerful politicians and business leaders in the state, worked to segregate public schools and to prevent Japanese from even owning land (223).

Our history includes vigilante terror campaigns against non-white populations. It consists of large landowners in combination with law enforcement officials brutalizing the laborers and farm workers who were essential to California’s prosperity. Racism, exploitation and conflict are part of who we are as we abide in this place.

3. Technology. Our orientation to science and technology also sets us apart. By the mid 1920’s fifty thousand commuters were passing through the San Francisco Ferry Building each day making it the busiest terminal in the world except for Charing Cross station in London (186). This need combined with technology and boldness led to the construction of a trestle bridge at Dumbarton point and then to the Bay and Golden Gate Bridges. During the same period one third of all the country’s air traffic was operating out of fifty landing fields in greater Los Angeles (255). In many respects California inventors and companies made the airplane a California technology. Indeed, we are not the first generation here to depend for our livelihoods, recreation and for that matter our water on the most advanced technologies of our day. We forget that the transcontinental railroad was an engineering miracle.

These technologies build on each other. The Pelton Turbine made hydraulic gold mining possible and washed away whole mountain slopes in the Sierra’s. This same technology vastly increased the production of hydroelectricity. This in turn made it cost effective to work with aircraft aluminum in Southern California. Pioneering work on vacuum tubes was done here in the 1920’s. In the 1930’s California led the world in atom-smashing. Then in the 1950’s it was semiconductors. This led to a leading role in the personal computer revolution and now the Internet. California is modern, always influenced by ever-receding dreams of becoming a technological utopia.

We abide here. Different regions in California place a different emphasis on these three elements but the shared fictions, our history of conflict and orientation toward technology define us as a people.

Jesus is right. If we only abided in California we would be lost. I suspect that we already know this. We are just as acquainted with the California nightmare as with the California dream. I believe that abiding in Jesus fundamentally changes our experience of the fiction, the conflict and technology. Because of him we can have lasting hope. The promise that we receive at our baptism is that California can never completely own us because we belong to our God.

Jesus describes this relationship by using the image of the grape vine. His primary point is that without our connection to God we cannot accomplish anything. Our success will always arise out of our relationship to God through the church. Secondly he says that the defining feature of our connection to God is the productivity of our lives. “By their fruits ye shall know them.” We are defined as Christians by our connection to Jesus through the church and by the fruits of our lives, not by what we believe as individuals.

An image of this that sustains me is the altar guild. No one here at Christ Church serves on the altar guild in order to be famous or rich. Each of these women spends a lot of time with Jesus and each other. They attend to the most meticulous details of our worship services together. They spend hundreds of hours each year dedicated to God’s glory making this church beautiful. When I was a child, my mother served on the altar guild and I would go with her to set up the weekday service. In the quiet of that silent church in the presence of those dedicated women, I felt the presence of God.

I have hinted at this. It is hard for us as Californians to understand abiding because it means really settling down, being present through thick and thin. The women of Christ Church’s altar guild have done this. But others of you know what it is like too. Those of you who really abide with your spouse realize that loving does not mean maintaining a certain mood. Contrary to what you see on TV, love is primarily a gift and a task, only secondarily is it a feeling.

In conclusion, our story of hope differs from that of other Californians. We do not put our trust in a twenty-first century Gold Rush. We are not first of all entrepreneurs or aspiring stars. Instead we believe that Jesus invites us into a community that will change the world and he gives us the power to do this. As Christian Californians we recognize our share in the history of conflict that surrounds and penetrates us while having faith that God can make us agents of reconciliation. We understand that technology is a kind of power but also that God is love and it is love that makes us whole.

I want to leave you with one final picture of what it means to abide in Christ. Last week I visited with a friend for what is likely to be the last time. Brian Thompson has accomplished a great deal in his life. I think he owned a bus company. Growing up he loved trains and as an adult he collected them. In fact all of you have seen these vehicles in Hollywood movies. This interest along with his unmatched passion for California history led him to start the railroad museum in Sacramento.

But above all Brian abides in Christ. These days his wife has Alzheimer’s disease and he is dying of cancer. He amazes the doctors not just by surviving beyond any of their expectations, but by living. Brian continues to live joyfully as a Christian fully connected to the body of Christ and because of this he I see him bearing fruit to the very end. As our last conversation wore down he said, “Malcolm you’ve got to tell them this. You never realize the depth of your faith until the chips are down.”

Brian’s confidence shows me the gift of the spirit. I still see him in my imagination, like the hawk flying over the ridges of Tamalpais, Brian is surrounded by beauty somewhere between California and heaven.

_____________________

Kevin Starr, California: A History (NY: Modern Library, 2005), 5. Page numbers in text refer to this book.
If I chose a fourth element that is essential to our identity as Californians it would be our orientation to our natural environment. This physical setting has a huge influence on how we see ourselves.

Disbelieving for Joy

M10

Acts 3:12-19
Ps. 4
1 Jn. 3:1-7
Lk. 24:36b-48

“And while they still disbelieved for joy, and wondered… he opened their minds to understand the scriptures…” Luke 24

I learned this week that three million Americans believe that aliens visit this planet in UFO’s. At the same time there are 2.2 million Episcopalians. This leads me to ask, what are the aliens doing that we are not doing?

It is so easy to find fault with the church, to criticize our failed good intentions or our constant struggle just to get organized. We haven’t done that much to feed hungry people or to advocate for the poor. Furthermore, we don’t handle the holy well. Sometimes we priests come to God with a false kind of professionalism a pompous dignity that keeps the radically transformative work of the spirit at arm’s lengths.

Other times we probably look more like a circus act, forgetting that our microphones are on, missing cues, saying the wrong things, interrupting each other and talking too fast. Sometimes we present you with unsingable hymns and jump around the prayer book as if we were administering a wacky intelligence test. The truth is that for most people church can at times be boring. There should be a disclaimer in the bulletin that says you should not operate heavy machinery while participating in worship.

When I was a child I thought that in Jesus’ time things were different, but the closer I read the scriptures the more human the disciples seem. When they see the risen Christ they don’t conclude that God’s kingdom is breaking into the world. They are startled and frightened. They don’t believe. They disagree. Because some of them think he is a kind of ghost, he invites them to see and touch him. Even then they still disbelieved for joy and wondered. Jesus goes to the absurd length of showing them that he can eat broiled fish.

Then he teaches them. The Bible says that he opens “their minds to understand the scriptures.” In this life and in resurrected life Jesus looks deeply into their souls. He sees what they most long for. He understands the part of them that stands between them and true joy. He shows them how their relationships can be healed, how God can restore their lives. Imagine someone who knows you so well that he or she can heal your soul. Imagine being part of a group of people who are on fire with the Holy Spirit.

What would it take for us to believe? Or more importantly what can we do to help others to have their lives transformed by Jesus? We accomplish both these tasks when we become better at telling our stories and at listening for connections between our lives and those of the people around us. The German thinker Max Weber described modern life in an industrial society as an “iron cage.” I believe that one of the effects of our hectic times is that it suppresses our stories, even the stories of our salvation.

Last night at a family party I had the blessed opportunity to spend a few hours with Melia’s godfather Mario who is a law professor at Miami University. I told him that as a citizen I was alarmed that the number of people incarcerated in this county has quadrupled in only twenty years. If our Gross Domestic Product or the population of San Francisco, or the size of our own family or unemployment rates or any almost any other figure like these had changed so dramatically in such a short time, I would want to know what caused it.

I asked, “Is the legal profession taking concerted action to address this serious problem.” It amazes me that he said, “No.” I asked him about the causes of this phenomenon. He said that mandatory sentencing rules, heavy prison terms for relatively minor drug crimes, increasing poverty all have contributed to this, along with a far more retributive approach to justice that is not at all concerned with rehabilitating prisoners. In Europe many nations simply address the drug problem differently. In Europe there is less violence associated with property crime than here and this also reduces prison terms.

Mario talked about the experience of going through the court system. Police in this country are allowed to lie, to say that they have witnesses to your actions when they don’t, to say that they will arrest your family when they can’t. In one famous case police told an unusually dim-witted suspect that the fax machine was a lie detector and convicted him on the basis of this confession.

Mario told me that the purpose of this is to force a suspect to fit into categories, into preconceived stories that this system uses to simplify the process of administering justice. In that world the details of your story are erased and your identity gets compressed so that you are merely an African American involved in urban drug culture, or a suburban white-collar criminal, or an Islamic terrorist.

He told me that if your crime is especially heinous they will listen more carefully to the details of your story and if you have a lot of money to hire legal experts they will too.

Millie Simpson was an elderly African American domestic servant who lived in Newark, New Jersey and commuted out to the wealthy suburbs by bus. She had an old car in her driveway that she never drove. One day an acquaintance took the car without asking and was involved in a hit and run accident. A witness identified her license plate and she was brought before the court. The first judge was only interested in her plea. After hearing that she claimed not to be driving the car, the judge entered her plea as not guilty.

The next judge interrupted Simpson when she tried to explain what happened. Even though her public defender was out of the room and he didn’t see any evidence, he ruled that she was guilty and sentenced her to a fine, community service and revoked her license. Because of the community service Simpson could no longer work after hours for one of her suburban clients. They needed her so badly that they hired a lawyer who went before the same judge and had the previous sentence dismissed. Simpson was quoted as saying, “I couldn’t understand what [the judge] was saying… I didn’t know what he was talking about.” Simpson's employer, however, had a different comment on Simpson's legal experiences: "[T]his was 'the typical story of American racism. To get justice, the poor black woman needs a rich white lady."

This is not an exception. Mario’s point was that part of the problem is that institutionally and through culture our criminal justice system and society in general suppress our individual stories.

I sometimes think that it is unfortunate that you did not know me before I became a priest. Mostly this means that you are in the habit of thinking that I am different than you. I sometimes wonder how this affects the way that we talk about Jesus together. At my class reunion last summer, although the people who really knew me expected it, most of my old friends from high school were surprised to learn that I had been ordained. Many of them learn only about Christianity from television dramas. Few of us have had much experience with younger clergy.

After the Vietnam War the leaders of my home diocese thought that there were too many priests. They stopped ordaining people who were in their twenties. They told young people to go and have another career and then come back to the church with their wisdom. There are many great second career priests. But this policy effectively told the world that the spirituality, the faith stories, of young people was less important.

I grew up in a community of people who firmly believed otherwise. St. Martin’s Episcopal church in Davis included me as a teenager in adult Christian education programs. They insisted that I serve as an acolyte and gave me the responsibility of teaching Sunday School for younger kids. When I expressed an interest in being ordained they supported me through the process and cut through the red tape that could have held me back. Most of all they always listened to my story and saw its connection to the Bible.

Jesus is not present in a general way. The Holy Spirit is not vague. These are the tangible ways that I saw God at work in the world. When my friends or I needed help, when I was tempted to go astray, God was saving me through the church.

I bring this up because I feel Jesus more and more present at Christ Church every day. In the holiness of the Lent that we shared together, through our ministry at Ventana School and Rebuilding Together, in the care we show to sick and suffering people, God is here. At the retreat last week four year old Melia Young and Lynn Saunders painted a picture together and what was most beautiful about that picture was that as they did it they shared their stories.

In a world which suppresses the unique stories of individuals, we are finding our voice. I want to ask you to do more to tell your story about God’s grace to people who have not yet discovered Christ Church. This is not to tell them that the way they see the world is wrong, but to let them know there is a place where their stories can be faithfully heard. Invite your friends to church. We are ready to receive them.

Someone once asked a French poet, “if the Louvre Museum were burning and you could only choose one work of art which one would you save?” He replied, “I would choose the fire.” In your life and your calling as a child of God be free to choose the fire. Allow yourself to be the way that God transforms the world. Let go of the stories that others tell about you which imprison or control your life-giving spirit. Let the risen Christ appear to you and appear in you, even when you are confused or afraid. Then we shall “be called children of God” and “when he appears we will be like him” (1 John 3).
___________________________

The first example and the concluding one about the Louvre Museum came from the presentations that various bishop candidates made during this week. The first came from Bonnie Perry quoting Jonathan Jensen. The second was from Marc Andrus.
Mario Lamont Barnes, “Black Women’s Stories and the Criminal Law: Restating the Power of Narrative,” 39 U.C. DAVIS L. REV.

Wednesday, April 19, 2006

The Lost Gospel

M9

Acts 10:34-43
Ps. 118:1-2, 14-24
1 Cor. 15:1-11
Mk. 16:1-8

“But by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace toward me has not been in vain”
1 Corinthians 15.

On a rainy day last week I met my friend Cliff in a Berkeley coffee shop. In our conversation, Cliff described himself as “kind of a loser” back when we were in high school. It seems pretty obvious to me that now he is a loser for Christ. Cliff is my friend who is a congregational minister and who was recently released after serving a prison term for trespassing during a protest of the School of the America’s in Georgia. With a passionate voice he reminded me that the prison system in this country has expanded fourfold over the last twenty-five years. In our free society we use incarceration to solve many problems that other countries address differently.

Cliff believes that the Christian churches should be sending missionaries into prisons, not as chaplains who work for the system and carry keys so that they can lock up when the guards are off, but as fellow prisoners. Recently Cliff was invited to preach at the First Waldensian Church of New York City. Don’t look it up when you visit. After surviving eight hundred years of persecution in Europe, this congregation of immigrants refused to merge with the Presbyterian church back in the 1920’s. Now they have no building and gather only once a year on the Sunday closest to February 17th and reminisce about Pastor Janavel from their wheelchairs. Whether it is to people who have lost their freedom or elderly immigrants who have lost their culture my friend Cliff ministers to people who have lost something important. He cares for losers.

I guess this makes us all eligible for Cliff’s attention. We are all in the process of losing something. What we are losing can never be replaced. The public has lost its sense of security. Nuclear proliferation in Iran, North Korea and elsewhere along with climate change could lead to the extinction of everything we know.

But there is also private loss. Look around this room. The people sitting next to you have lost fortunes, friends, husbands, wives and children. Perhaps you yourself are losing the job that defines your identity. Maybe you learned from a note on the kitchen table that your spouse was leaving you. If you pause to think about it, your children’s childhood is quickly slipping away. Others of you have lost your health and soon will lose your life.

The losses I am talking about are not trivial. Imagine the woman who crosses the street with her daughter every day to go to her mailbox. One day she hesitates to pull a few weeds out of her garden. Her little girl waits for permission before going across the street for the mail. She gets a few bills out of the box and asks if it is safe to cross again. Her mother glances up and says yes. But a car she didn’t see kills the small child. Without some kind of miracle this mother will never be able to forgive herself, she will never be whole. If you think it is difficult to believe in Jesus’ resurrection, try believing that losers like us can have hope.

In Jesus I have been blessed beyond imagining and found strength in the face of my losses. I know what it feels like to have hope, to be saved by him. For millions of others around the globe faith is the experience of finding oneself in the person of Jesus Christ. Although what we have lost can never be restored, we find our lives transformed in him.

So much about Jesus has been lost in history. It seems like a small miracle to discover something new. This is exactly what happened last week when the National Geographic society announced that it had found a Coptic translation of the Gospel of Judas originally written some time before the year 180 A.D.

News accounts about this fall into two categories. The manuscript was discovered during the 1970’s in a cave by Egyptian farmers. The first kind of newspaper article focuses on the greed of the antiquities dealers who took so long to bring it before the public. This kind of article asks ethical questions, whether this is a looted artifact and about the responsibility to share archaeological findings with all scholars.

The second type of article stirs up theological controversy. These writers interpret the text to mean that Judas did not betray Jesus as churches usually teach, but rather that he was under Jesus’ secret orders in going to the police. The most frequently quoted line from the Gospel of Judas is obscure without the context. It has Jesus saying to Judas, “But you will exceed all of them. For you will sacrifice the man that clothes me.” Newspapers ask what the account of Jesus’ crucifixion would mean if none of his friends so blatantly betrayed him. Others simply reject the usefulness of this text out of hand. Officials at the Vatican condemn the Gospel of Judas as contrary to Christian doctrine.

But what does this ancient manuscript mean to us as people who continue to lose what cannot be replaced but who still find hope in Jesus? For me this description of Jesus written more than a century after his death gives a clearer picture of God’s church right now. Most importantly it serves as a reminder that Christians have never completely agreed on who Jesus is.

It doesn’t take more than a few sentences for anyone who has studied biblical history to recognize that the Gospel of Judas was written by Gnostic Christians. The Greek word gnosis means wisdom and these Gnostics saw themselves as Christians. They knew that what most separated them from the orthodox church was their belief in secret teachings about an all-encompassing battle between the material world and the spiritual one.

The animating idea behind the Gospel of Judas is that the disciples of Jesus never understood his true teachings and the church they founded is irrecoverably corrupt. Orthodox Christians regard Judas as a betrayer. According to this text he was the only one to really understand Jesus. In the Gospel of Judas Jesus says, “[L]et any one of you who is [strong enough] among human beings bring out the perfect human and stand before my face.” And only “Judas Iscariot… was able to stand before him.”

Reading this text is like leafing through the books in the Rosicrucian Library at the Egyptian museum in San Jose which is a kind of new age bookstore on steroids. Like those authors, this writer seems so confident in his intentional obscurity. It seems deliberately unclear in order to create an aura of mystery. This recovered gospel includes a lengthy account of Judas’ secret vision. Jesus teaches him about the “enlightened divine Self-Generated,” about the angels appointed to control the “aeons and the heavens” and about the other angels who rule over “chaos and the [underworld].”

Orthodox Christians rejected Gnostic teachings about Jesus from the very early days of the church. The whole reason I knew about the existence of a Gospel of Judas was that orthodox Christians such as Irenaeus (130-202) mention it.

I think that they were right to exclude texts like this for use in worship for two reasons. Apart from being unclear and its one-dimensional portrayal of Jesus, The Gospel of Judas makes it seem as if some people really are special, perfect even, immune from the losses that define our humanity. According to the Gnostic picture of the world only the wisest, most intelligent people can attain true faith. This effectively reproduces earthly hierarchies in heaven. The orthodox church was right to resist the power grab that lies behind pictures of religion as a form of secret knowledge.

Second, I believe in the incarnation. That is another way of saying that I believe in a God who creates the world and is still involved in it. Jesus was a real person with real earthly needs, desires and sufferings. But Jesus is also still here. The church is the body of Christ at work in the world.

In summary, the Gospel of Judas increases my appreciation for the vivid stories about a human Jesus in the Bible and its promise that God’s love always exceeds our tribal instincts and is really part of our world. Discovering the Gospel of Judas reminds me that we can never own Jesus, our historical connection will always be a question for us.

An example from today’s readings makes this clear. Most scholars that I know are pretty certain that we do not have the ending that the author of Mark’s gospel wrote. The gospel concludes with these words about the women who discovered the empty tomb, “and they said nothing to anyone, for they were afraid.” Experts who study the Bible believe that a scribe at some point supplied a longer ending using words, a style and a theology that were alien to Mark. You should look at the text yourself. The longer ending sounds completely different from the rest of the gospel even when you read it in English.

This probably isn’t common knowledge because this kind of thinking upsets some people. A modern church that condemns the Gospel of Judas as heresy, or an ancient sect that claims that what really matter is a secret knowledge for spiritual elites, or for that matter an atheist who regards religion as merely a belief about God all fundamentally get it wrong.

Beliefs about Jesus will come and go. But ultimately what you believe isn’t what really matters. The spirit of God is not something that we can own like a possession. Our job as Jesus’ followers is not to convince everyone else that their ideas are wrong.

Instead the life of faith is the process of being transformed by Jesus. It means beginning to pray like he prays, to love what he loves. It means having the same kind of relationship with God and other people that he had. It means beginning to be defined by our hope that God gives life even in death rather than identifying ourselves with our fear of loss.

In conclusion, not so long ago Midwest farmers at the first sign of a blizzard would run a rope from the back door to the barn. They all had heard stories of people who had lost sight of home in a whiteout and frozen to death in their own backyards. Our modern blizzards, our public disasters and our private despair leave us in danger of losing our very selves. But like my friend Cliff we are beginning to be losers for Christ. The Bible, the church and our prayers together teach us about Jesus and he connects this home on earth to our home in God.
______________________
I don’t know what names the kids call each other these days, but when I was in high school “loser” was one of the words they used. We probably didn’t think about this word too much. Our classmates used it to describe my friends who hung out smoking cigarettes in the parking lot. What is a loser?
It isn’t the opposite of being a winner because that wasn’t an adjective we used to describe people. Maybe it was someone who didn’t have complete control over how others perceived him or who just didn’t care about what others thought really mattered. On the other hand perhaps the word only says something about the person who uses it.
February 17 is the anniversary of the Edict of Emancipation.
I read this in a sermon preparing for 5 Lent.
“How the Gospel of Judas Emerged,” New York Times, 4/13/2006.
John Noble Wilford and Laurie Goodstein, “In Ancient Document Judas Minus the Betrayal,” New York Times, 4/7/2006. More recently both themes are addressed together. Peter Steinfels, “A Debate Flares on Betrayal,” New York Times, 4/15/06.
“Papal Preacher Blasts Da Vinci Code, Judas Gospel, ”Reuters 4/14/2006, http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/arts/entertainment-pope-davinci.html.

Giving Your Life

M8

Jer. 31:31-4
Ps 51:1-13
Heb. 5:5-10
Jn. 12:20-33


“And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself” John 12.

This poem is called “Ask Me,” by William Stafford (1914-1993):
“Some time when the river is ice ask me
mistakes I have made. Ask me whether
what I have done is my life. Others
have come in their slow way into
my thought, and some have tried to help
or to hurt: ask me what difference
their strongest love or hate has made.

I will listen to what you say.
You and I can turn and look
at the silent river and wait. We know
the current is there, hidden; and there
are comings and goings from miles away
that hold the stillness exactly before us.
What the river says, that is what I say.”

Is what you have done your life? What difference have those who love you and hate you made?

Jesus says, “Those who love their life lose it, and those who hate their life in this world will keep it for eternal life” (Jn. 12). He puts into question what it means to live or die. He makes us less certain what our life really is. I believe that it takes someone with the power of Jesus to dispel our most persistent illusions. Some fantasies can be so widespread within a culture that it can take generations to understand the truth.

Between the years 1570 and 1630 Western Europeans burned between thirty and fifty thousand people to death as witches (only a comparatively tiny number of heretics were burned during this same period). In Trier, Germany 368 witches were burned in twenty-two villages over only a six-year period. In two of these villages the persecution did not stop until there was only one woman left.

Amazingly enough during the preceding so-called Dark Ages there was little or no witch persecution and canon law even specified that “whoever believes in witches is an infidel and pagan” and “unchristian.” Then in the fifteenth century these convictions changed. A professor at the University of the Sorbonne wrote in 1601 that the existence of witches could be disbelieved only by those of unsound mind.”

Perhaps one of the most extraordinary features of this cultural hysteria is that historians can find no evidence to suggest that ritual devil worship actually happened in Western Europe. The historian Margaret Miles convincingly writes that, “Witchcraft seems to have been neither a religion nor an organization, but a massive collective fantasy.”

Why did this happen? The recent invention of the printing press made it possible to circulate thousands of pamphlets which included details about what witches did and how they were punished. These broadsheets told people that witches caused disease, impotence, accidents and crop failures. Because more than eighty percent of the people who were burned to death were women, misogyny probably was a contributing factor in the persecutions. Historians also believe that a connection existed between the use of judicial torture and the intensity of this hysteria. England was the only country that did not use torture for either crime or witchcraft and persecution was less a part of life there.

But these reasons cannot explain the deep anxiety in the mind of that generation. I wonder what behavior we take completely for granted but that may seem equally baffling to future historians. What is our massive collective fantasy? What fears inform our actions and what do they tell us about our life and our commitments? (I wonder which of our attitudes concerning drugs, children, terrorism, healthcare, immigration, globalization, incarceration, work, etc. will make sense to another generation).

The psychologist Elizabeth Loftus became famous as a defense witness in court trials of people who were accused of sexual abuse on the basis of repressed memories. She points out that there is no scientific evidence that what we call repression really exists. Scientists study various kinds of amnesia closely. Some people may forget what happened in a traumatic traffic accident, but they are conscious that a memory is missing. Those who believe in repression claim that we can have no sensation of having forgotten some of the memories that are most important to who we are. They also seem to overestimate the reliability of our memory.

On August 18, 1967 at Boston’s Fenway Park Red Sox outfielder Tony Conigliaro was at the plate facing California Angels pitcher Jack Hamilton. On the first pitch Hamilton threw a fastball that crushed the left side of Conigliaro’s face. Conigliaro never completely recovered from his injury. He left baseball in 1975 and died at the age of forty-five. That moment changed Jack Hamilton forever too.

In 1990 when Conigliaro died, Hamilton gave an interview with the New York Times in which he recalled what happened that day. “I’ve had to live with it,” He said,”I think about it a lot. It was like the sixth inning when it happened. I think the score was 2-1, and he was the eighth hitter in the batting order. With the pitcher up next, I had no reason to throw at him.” Hamilton remembers visiting him in the hospital that afternoon. He also remembers wondering whether he should return to Fenway for the next series of games that season.

Although Hamilton probably thought about this day many times his recollections were almost completely wrong. The accident didn’t happen in the sixth inning but in the fourth. The score was not 2-1 but 0-0. Conigliaro wasn’t the eighth hitter but the sixth. It wasn’t even a day game so Hamilton couldn’t have visited him in the hospital that afternoon, and there were no other games in Boston that year for him to wonder about whether or not he should go back there.

It should come as no surprise to us that our memories are unreliable, that we can get important details wrong. A cognitive psychologist asked forty-four students the question, “How did you first hear the news of the space ship Challenger explosion.” He asked them the morning after the explosion and then two and a half years later. Although they described the memories as vivid during this second interview, none of their memories were completely accurate and one third of their memories were what the researcher called “wildly inaccurate.” Many of these students couldn’t believe that their revised memories were wrong. “This is my handwriting, so it must be right,” said one student, “but I still remember everything the way I told you [just now]. I can’t help it.”

Not only can we be completely wrong about past events, we can remember things that never even happened. Psychologists have studied the ways that false memories can be inadvertently and intentionally implanted in someone else’s mind. One student did this by asking his fourteen-year-old younger brother to write a paragraph each day on four events that he described. Three of the events actually happened as part of the family’s history and one was a fictitious story about being lost at a mall. By the end of the week the younger brother could describe details about something that never happened.

Earlier I mentioned Elizabeth Loftus as a psychologist who studies memory. She is not an uncontroversial figure. Some people absolutely hate her. It may be partly because they believe she defends criminals, but even this is not enough to explain the vehemence of their response to her work. I have a theory. I think that it is partly because her research undermines some deeply held assumptions about who we think we are.

In modern times there are so many subtle ways of not believing in God. One of them is to understand ourselves as a kind of videotape that summarizes our past, to think that in a significant sense we are our memories. If this is the implicit picture that someone has of himself, a psychologist’s claims that the tape is unreliable can seem like an attack on his identity.

For me this way of understanding our selves is in contrast with the Bible. According to Christian tradition we do not have an existence that is independent of God. Who we are does not derive from who we were. Our life is not something that came about accidentally because of the lust or love of two other human beings a long time ago. We don’t earn our life. Instead we constantly derive our life from God. Who we are is a gift from God that we receive every day.

In the Old Testament God speaks to us. “I will put my law within them, and I will write it in their hearts; and I will be their God” (Jer. 31). Our existence is a constant expression of God’s love. At the deepest level of who we are is not a memory but God.

I’m having a hard time saying it, but what this means is that you are fundamentally safe. You do not need to worry about losing your job, your spouse, your health, the respect of the other kids in school. The self that you are is not something that you achieve through some kind of work. It is not something that comes into existence because of what you think. This self is safe from the world

Perhaps what Jesus means is that the part of ourselves we are so afraid of losing isn’t really us anyway. When the Greeks come, they want the same thing that I do. They tell Philip that they want to see Jesus. He says to them, “And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself.”

The novelist Ernest Hemmingway writes about a father in Spain who wanted to be reconciled to his runaway son. The father takes out an advertisement in the Madrid paper El Liberal. It says, “Paco, meet me noon on Tuesday at the Hotel Montana. All is forgiven! Love, Papa.” Paco was a common name in those days. When the father showed up he found eight hundred young men looking for their fathers.

The way that Jesus speaks through the Bible is like this. Right here we have a whole church full of Pacos, of children returning to their father. We are not our memories, our thoughts or even our actions. Like California pitcher Jack Hamilton and the witch hunters of the sixteenth century we will make minor mistakes and some terrible life-changing ones.

But none of this changes the truth. You can ask me if what I have done is my life or about the influence of people who have loved and hated me. But that is not what I am. We are children of God who Jesus calls to return. And one day he will lift us all up into the fullness of divine joy.
___________________
Published in Twentieth-Century American Poetry, Ed. Dana Gioia, David Mason, Meg Schoerke (NY: McGraw Hill, 2004), 530.
Margaret R. Miles, The Word Made Flesh: A History of Christian Thought (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2005), 296-7.
Elizabeth Loftus and Katherine Ketchem, The Myth of Repressed Memory: False Memories and Allegations of Sexual Abuse (NY: St. Martin’s Press, 1994), 75.
Ibid., 91-2.
Ibid., 97-8.
Thomas Tewell, “The Things We Dare Not Remember,” Thirty Good Minutes, 16 November 2003. http://www.csec.org/csec/sermon/tewell_4707.htm

Thursday, March 30, 2006

Lifting Up Serpents

M7

Num. 21:4-9
Ps 107:1-3,17-22
Eph. 2:1-10
Jn. 3:14-21

“And just as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, so must the Son of Man be lifted up, that whoever believes in him may not perish but have eternal life” John 3:14.

Look around you. Imagine that you are the people of Israel, because in a way you are. You left slavery in Egypt with sore backs and calloused hands. Beatings and hard labor made your joints so sore that you thought you could never escape the Pharaoh’s army. When the Red Sea swallowed up the finest warriors in the world, you wrote songs of celebration.

Fresh from this victory, breathing the clean air of freedom and with a new lightness in their steps the people of Israel passed quickly through the desert to the edge of the promised land. Before going into this land of Canaan you choose twelve people: Rachel Wagner, Alan Sarles, Laura Barker, Robert Pescosolido, Jim Snell, Maryetta Shriver, Clare Ledwith, Gloria Wing, Paula Matosian, Bob Stanfield, Paul Kojola and Bill Bien. You send them as spies to survey the land.

They arrive at harvest time and spend forty days traveling in secret through a place of overwhelming beauty. The twelve agree completely about the richness of this land of milk and honey. They cannot help but notice the severe contrast between it and the desert they just passed through. At the same time, ten of the spies (I won’t say who) have also noticed that the people who already live there seem stronger and larger than us (Numbers 13).

Two of the spies want to follow God’s command and find a place to live in the promised land. They make their case but the overwhelming majority of us are so afraid to go that we threaten to stone them to death. And so we all return to the desert for forty years, where each of the spies dies, except for the two who did not rebel against God.

Even though WE chose it, the harshness of desert life makes us complain about God. We say that he should have left us in Egypt. We seem to despise our own freedom. Nothing seems quite right to us although we probably grumble about our food the most. There is a kind of poison in our community and we will not be won over to God. So God sends poisonous snakes which kill our friends and our children. Imagine many of us dying, the rest of us bitten and waiting to die.

But again God sees our suffering and has mercy on us. He instructs Moses to make a bronze serpent on a high pole. The people who look at it will live. So Moses walks deliberately around our camp tents. He calls each of us out by name so that we can look and be saved. Moses cannot change the fact that we have been bitten. He cannot remove the poison, but through him God can make us live (Numbers 21).

We are the people of Israel. The same poison runs thick in our veins also.

In one summer month both of my grandfather’s sons moved to California. I’ll never forget the day we said goodbye, my hippie uncle telling my conservative father that he would meet us in the promised land. He was right. We live in the land of milk and honey, in these green hills between the richest agricultural valley in the world and the vast mystery of the Pacific Ocean.

At this time of year, in this mild climate, the wildflowers covering these hills seem like signs of God’s continuing grace. According to any measure from objective industrial productivity to the subjective beauty of our sunsets, California is rich.

We would notice this more if it we did not have the poison. All of us experience its effects in slightly different ways. We have conflict with people who we are supposed to love. We worry about the future. We have a vague sense that something is not right, that we are not keeping up, or living up to our potential. We also see signs that frighten us: this country’s steeply rising debt and our own, increasing healthcare costs, the declining quality of education, global climate change along with our political leaders’ vague threats of terrorism. Personally we feel vulnerable, that somehow we haven’t done enough to protect ourselves.

Alan Watts, a former Episcopal priest and teacher of Zen Buddhism points out that we will never be satisfied if our happiness depends on material things or on other people’s opinion of us. I have read Alan Watts’ books. I recognize this wisdom. At the same time I feel wounded by knowing that this was too hard for him and that he died young of alcoholism.

Watts never wrote openly about his own struggles with alcohol, but in a touching aside he writes anonymously about what seems to be his own experience. “In very many cases [the alcoholic] knows quite clearly that he is destroying himself, that for him, liquor is poison, that he actually hates being drunk, and even dislikes the taste of liquor. And yet he drinks. For, dislike it as he may, the experience of not being drunk is worse. It gives him “horrors” for he stands face to face with the unveiled, basic insecurity of the world.”

If anyone should be immune from this poison, the symptoms of which include our basic sense of insecurity, it should be graduates of Harvard Divinity School. They should be both intelligent and spiritual. Last June I heard Professor Kim Patton give the sermon at graduation. She addressed students applying to jobs and doctoral programs who were concerned about “gaps” in their resumes. She said, “Like the wider American culture, Harvard lionizes the loner, the brilliant individual who has won some high-level game of musical chairs where 150 players contend for 8 seats and the music is by Mahler.” She reassures them that, “[t]he gaps on the resumes are the abysses into which we fall from time to time, and in the process, fall into the hands of the living God…”

The bad news is that everyone has the poison, we all just show different symptoms of the same disease. I pray about this because I believe that this poison leads many to misunderstand one of the most important things that Jesus ever said. This verse is a famous one. At football games people hold up signs that say “John 3:16.” In it Jesus says, “For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life.”

Unfortunately a vast majority of Christians in this country interpret these words to mean that if you are not in their Jesus club, God will condemn you to eternal death. For them, unless you say certain words or think certain thoughts about Jesus, in the way that they do, you are what they call “unsaved.” This is not a biblical word so you may have trouble understanding it. But if you spend time with Christians like this you hear it all the time. They talk about their “saved” friends and their “unsaved” friends. And then the complicated world filled with our own poison suddenly seems a lot safer and simpler to them.

“Saved” Christians may not tell you this, but the context of Jesus’ remarks matter. Jesus is talking to Nicodemus a kind of first century theology professor who came to him secretly in the night. Nicodemus wants to know who Jesus is. And because like us both of them are people of Israel, Jesus answers by referring to a story about the time when the people of Israel chose to wander in the desert rather than follow God’s instructions.

Jesus says, “[j]ust as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, so must the Son of Man be lifted up…” Unless you remember the story of Moses curing his snake-bitten people with the bronze snake pole, this can be one of Jesus’ most perplexing statements.

Even after reading both stories this might justifiably leave you lost. This is a prophetic symbol, in other words it is a sign to let you know what God is about to do before it is too late. We’re all familiar with symbols like this. We encounter them in secular contexts all the time. For instance, in the movie Titanic, we see the officers on the bridge drinking a cup of hot coffee on a cold night peering out into the fog. The camera pans all the way down the ship, as some ice floats by while the audience hears cellos make a low shimmering sound.

In ancient times people believed that when you saw something, a part of you went out from your eyes and touched the world. It sounds odd when Jesus compares being crucified to being lifted up like Moses’ bronze snake. But Nicodemus probably understood what Jesus means. Seeing the bronze snake could not take away the poison but it could restore life. In the same way, if we can be touched by a God who suffers on the cross, we can have life too. This does not mean that all the poison in the world instantly disappears. But Jesus does make it possible to survive, to really be alive again.

This is the central mystery and challenge of Christianity: letting go of a picture of a god who miraculously adjusts the world to meet the demands of our ego and embracing the real Jesus who suffers for you and with you and in you, who through you brings love into the world.

It is hard to keep an image of Jesus suffering on the cross at the center of our life. We want to substitute that picture with the Messiah king who uses overwhelming power to justify us and bring the kind of peace we want. But in the end it is the suffering Christ who can save us.

I wish I could speak at greater length about this, because I have seen so many miracles happen through Jesus’ love. Sometimes amazing grace comes out of terrible suffering.

Fred Craddock is one of the most distinguished preachers of our time. He tells the story about God’s persistence in calling his father. He says, “When the pastor used to come from my mother’s church to call on him, my father would say, “You don’t care about me. I know how churches are. You want another pledge… Isn’t that the whole point of church?”… My nervous mother would run into the kitchen crying for fear somebody’s feelings were hurt… I guess I heard it a thousand times.”

“One time he didn’t say it. He was at the Veteran’s Hospital. He was down to 74 pounds. They had taken out his throat, put in a metal tube, and said, “Mr. Craddock, you should have come in earlier. But this cancer is awfully far advanced. We’ll give radium, but we don’t know.” I went in to see him. In every window [were] potted plants and flowers. Everywhere there was place to set them – potted plants and flowers… There was by his bed a stack of cards. And I want to tell you, every card, every blossom, every potted plant [came] from groups, Sunday School classes, women’s groups, youth groups… of my mother’s church – every one of them.”

“My father saw me reading them. He could not speak, but he took a Kleenex box and wrote something on the side from Shakespeare’s Hamlet… He wrote…, “In this harsh world, draw your breath in pain to tell my story.” I said, “What is your story, Daddy? And he wrote, “I was wrong.”

Look around you. Imagine that you are people of Jesus, because you are. In your veins you have the same poison that is killing others all around you. But somewhere in your heart God has revealed his suffering for you. In our shared Eucharist his love becomes eternal life in you.
_____________

This part of The Wisdom of Insecurity is quoted in Monica Furlong, Zen Effects: The Life of Alan Watts (Woodstock, Vermont: Skylight Paths Publishing, 2001), 150.
Kimberly C. Patton, “When the Wounded Emerge as Healers,” Harvard Divinity Bulletin, Winter 2006, 57
This whole paragraph comes from a conversation with Rick Fabian who is preparing this material for a lecture at Sewanee on the open table.
Cited in Jim Fitzgerald’s sermon, “Serpents, Penguins and Crosses,” Preacher’s Magazine Lent/Easter 2006. http://www.preachersmagazine.org/webmar26.htm